Overcoming a challenge is always satisfying, and it certainly beats NOT overcoming it. For researchers on the project led by Genome Alberta that is applying genomics to boost pig resilience, challenges are an essential part of achieving their goals.
“All animals are susceptible to disease, but those with resilience will recover faster and have less effect on production,” said Dr. Graham Plastow, Professor, CEO – Livestock Gentec Centre, Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science at the University of Alberta.
Bracing for impact
Dr. Plastow defines resilience as the ability of an animal to respond to any disease challenge in a way that minimizes its impact. It’s a concept that’s easy to grasp even if you’re not a scientist, as long as you have experience with sickness.
“We see in humans that some people get the flu, go to bed and drink fluids and are back to work in one or two days. At the same time, others with the exact same condition may be laid low for weeks before they recover. For the purposes of this project, we are interested in pigs that take a break when they’re sick, but then are up and active again quite quickly.”
Pig disease can plague the bottom line
As fascinating as the phenomenon of resilience is to researchers, it’s equally interesting for pork producers, and for good reason: animal disease represents a sizable expense to the pork industry. Though feed costs get most of the attention these days, the economic impact of health issues in terms of treatment and mortality is often underestimated.
Fortunately, researchers appreciate the toll that a disease challenge can take on a farm, and are determined to harness the power of genomics in addressing the problem; to accomplish that, however, they face challenges of their own.
Exporting genetics, not disease
“When we look for variation in resilience or susceptibility to disease, there is definitely a genetic component. For breeding companies, though, it can be hard to get a hold of that variation as we try and keep the nucleus herds that produce genetic improvements as healthy as possible. In part, this is because we want to export our genetics around the world, and we can’t do that if they take disease with them. Also, because we are generally selecting for genetic potential, we keep disease away so we can select the best animals with the best potential.”
Where the conflict arises is that as you go down the production pyramid, you have more pigs, more farms and more pathogens, and it becomes harder to maintain biosecurity. As well, some clinical diseases tend to be more severe on the lower rungs of the pyramid.
“For those reasons, we are trying to discover with this project how to develop new tools to identify the genetic potential of animals in those high health environments, while also predicting the performance of their offspring in commercial herds where disease challenges are greater. That is a unique element here, and it’s why a key component of our research is creating new tests to assess the strength of an animal’s immune response. These are animals that are not exposed in the nucleus herd, but we look at what we can do through introducing disease to explore their potential immune response when they are challenged.”
Reaching their goal of enhanced disease resilience through genomics won’t be easy, but if doing so can boost pig health and keep producers in the black, most would agree it beats the alternative.